Claude Code week – Opus 4.7, routines, and multi-agent review


Claude Code week – Opus 4.7, routines, and multi-agent review
Four posts on what changed in Claude Code this week (plus Opus 4.7 benchmarks).  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
WotAI

Claude Code week – Opus 4.7, routines, and multi-agent review

Hey Reader,

Four posts on Claude Code, all connected. Anthropic shipped Opus 4.7 on Thursday, Claude Code 2.1.112 on Friday, and the thread running through every release this month is the same – make the agent loop tighter.

Here's the reading order I'd suggest.

Claude Opus 4.7 + Claude Code 2.1.112: what actually changed

SWE-bench Verified jumped from 80.8% on Opus 4.6 to 87.6% on 4.7. SWE-bench Pro went from 53.4% to 64.3%. Same price. New `xhigh` effort level that Claude Code now defaults to on every plan. Auto mode available for Max subscribers without a flag.

I recap the benchmarks, the tokenizer change (yes, it's different), and the past two weeks of Claude Code releases in one table.

Read the Opus 4.7 breakdown →

Claude Code routines – work while you sleep

Anthropic shipped routines the week prior. Saved configurations that run autonomously on their cloud with three trigger types: schedule, API, and GitHub events. If you've been duct-taping GitHub Actions and `claude -p` to get autonomous sessions, routines are the official replacement.

Six practical use cases inside, from nightly backlog triage to cross-repo library porting.

Read the routines breakdown →

Anthropic's multi-agent code review – what it means for workflow automation

Claude Code 2.1.111 shipped `/ultrareview` (parallel multi-agent code review). That pattern didn't come out of nowhere – Anthropic published the multi-agent architecture back in March, and it's becoming the default for complex agent workflows.

Multiple specialist agents examine PRs from different angles, an aggregator consolidates findings, and the whole thing coordinates through a shared context layer. Worth reading if you want to understand where `/ultrareview`'s design comes from.

Read the multi-agent breakdown →

WoterClip – stop babysitting your AI coding agent

If multi-agent review is the pattern, WoterClip is the DIY version. An open-source Claude Code plugin that turns Linear into an agent orchestration layer. One Claude instance, multiple personas (CEO, Orchestrator, custom), zero infrastructure.

Persona-based routing lets one Claude handle different types of work based on Linear issue labels. No API server, no database, no separate processes – just markdown files and YAML.

Read the WoterClip breakdown →

If you want these in order, start with the Opus 4.7 recap (what's new), then routines (cloud automation), then the multi-agent piece (how the pattern works), and finish with WoterClip (running it yourself).

Reply and let me know which one surprised you.

– Alex


P.S. – if you're reading all four of these and thinking "OK I want to actually set Claude Code up this way" – that's exactly what I teach in the workshop.

Production-Grade Claude Code in 5 Days – June 1 cohort. Early bird is $297 through May 15 (saves $200 off the $497 regular price). 30 seats, all still open.

Same setup I use to ship daily, unpacked in 5 days.

Save my seat →

Read the Opus 4.7 breakdown →

Reply to this email anytime – I read every one.

WotAI · AI Automation that Actually Ships

wotai.co

WotAI · 440 N. Barranca Ave., Unit 3777, Covina, CA 91723

WotAI

If you're building with Claude Code, n8n, or AI agents in production, this is the email I'd want. Weekly recap of what shipped, what broke, and how I'm running it. Specific over vague. Replies welcome.

Read more from WotAI
Your CLAUDE.md File Is Too Long

1,204 lines down to 151 The four-bucket diet, and the 20 lines no model can rediscover. Plus 3 more reads. 1,204 lines down to 151 Hey Reader, Four reads this week, and each one spends its best section on the same question: which part of this should you leave alone? The lines you don't delete. The invoices you keep typing by hand. The decisions you never route through software. Every line gets paid for on every session (most don't earn it) Anthropic cut roughly 80 percent of Claude Code's own...

When not to buy an AI agent The three questions that decide it, and what a missed call is actually worth. Plus 3 more reads. When not to buy an AI agent Hey Reader, Two people in your business describe the same process differently. That is the clearest signal it is not ready to automate. You do not have a workflow, you have two workflows and a disagreement. Automate it anyway and you lock in whichever version the person configuring it happened to believe. This week's first two reads are about...

110 free AI models, tested 16 providers, what's actually free, and the catches each one hides. Plus 3 more reads. 110 free AI models, tested Hey Reader, Four reads this week. The first two go together: where the free AI models actually are, and how to put Claude Code in charge of them. 110 free AI models, and what each one actually costs you Sixteen providers hand out real API access right now. Not trials. Free tiers, running today. The catch is that "free" is doing different work at each...